W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experiencew.r.t.accessing RDF collections

From: Mikael Nilsson <mini@nada.kth.se>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:21:18 +0200
Message-ID: <434A86EE.9050508@nada.kth.se>
To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org

Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
> I understand the concerns over a complex range like this, and
> appreciate very well the problems that exist for DC elements.  That's
> why the SKOS collection stuff is still rated 'unstable'.

For the record, and as some of you might know, the DC Architecture 
Working Group [0] is determined to clean up the ranges of the DC 
properties. See the (very unfinished) work of the RDF Taskforce [1].

As part of this, dc:creator will have range something like 
dcclass:Agent, which will be disjoint from rdfs:Literal. Whether this 
will happen in current or new namespaces is still under consideration.


[0] http://dublincore.org/groups/architecture/
[1] http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/Metadata/DCRDFTaskforce
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 02:37:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:37 UTC