Re: summary of some cwm/euler implementation experiencew.r.t.accessing RDF collections

Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
> I understand the concerns over a complex range like this, and
> appreciate very well the problems that exist for DC elements.  That's
> why the SKOS collection stuff is still rated 'unstable'.

For the record, and as some of you might know, the DC Architecture 
Working Group [0] is determined to clean up the ranges of the DC 
properties. See the (very unfinished) work of the RDF Taskforce [1].

As part of this, dc:creator will have range something like 
dcclass:Agent, which will be disjoint from rdfs:Literal. Whether this 
will happen in current or new namespaces is still under consideration.


Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 02:37:20 UTC