- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:29:34 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
This morning, when working on the weekly agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda I was doing an audit of the status of our comments http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html I just finished the audit. Then I took another pass over it to be more explicit about who has the ball on each one. A copy of the results is below. I hope it's clear that the editors and chair have plenty in their queues. This is a request for the rest of you to help out. If you're not sure where to help, take one of the ones marked "for WG consideration" or "possibly editorial, possibly substantive" and mail the WG with a suggestion of what to do with it: what text, if any, to change, and what to say to the commentor to attempt to satisfy them. Please start a new thread rather than replying to this message, and please give a pointer to the relevant message from the -comments archive, along with some subject/from/date info. lc status: as of 1.32: * 14 closed :) * 13 pending: * 3 where the chair just needs to tidy the thread state: IRIs vs RDF URI References; the 13 Oct msg says "... looks good"; SPARQL variable names syntax similarly, Some typos in WD * 6 pending a reply from the commentor: QuotedIRIref too lax , ORDER with IRIs, incorrect/confusing example in 9.3, BASE IRI resolution, Backslashes in string literals, Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable * 1 where the commentor gave further editorial information for consideration by the protocol editor: SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS * 4 where the commentor supplies further information for consideration by the WG: * Charmod conformance; my OK? message has a forward reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG review in reply * External storage of queries reminds me that we owe ietf-types a review of our MIME types. DaveB tried but ran into list admin foo. * Query forms should be resources, not operations baker 5Sep, baker 6 Sep * 36 open: * 3 for the chair to clean up thread-state: Roman Numeral test, Typo in RDF Dataset definition, SPARQL Protocol for RDF * 1 that's more of a how-to that Andy mostly redirected; chair (or helper) should either close the thread or explicitly ask if the commentor is happy to take their question elsewhere: need extar information in SPARQL * 3 connect to valueTesting which we just closed 25 Oct with actions on EricP, I think: language tag issues, Error handling, isURI poorly named * 8 clearly editorial: * protocol: typo and general, Style for PRE boxes, Wrong SOAP namespace, WSDL comments on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft * query results: rdf-sparql-xmlres and CSS styling, Query Results XML Format typo * QL: acknowledge prior art, Editorial comments on Last Call WD from ivan, * 2 connected to WSDL 2.0 changes we requested, pending one more reply from WSD WG: Protocol Review and Comments, Note about WSDL2 Binding * 4 clearly-substantive requests for WG consideration: * results format: SPARQL Results Format and Unbound Variables, Broad application of CSS hypertext pseudo-classes * QL: from the XML Query and the XSL WGs, format based on Unicode? * 5 connected to an open WG issue, rdfSemantics: Barstow, pfps x3, entailment, soundness, completeness * 10 possibly substantive, possibly editorial: * QL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance, Security Considerations, General Document Comments,Querying the Dataset, Semantics of queries involving named graphs, section 2, Example Errors, sections 3 onwards * 1 for the chair or a QL editor to check that we've handled it all and send an [OK?] message: twinql Retrospective * protocol: on SPARQL protocol document -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 03:29:39 UTC