Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note

On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:52:40AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >The WG decided to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus
> >... today. The note was to reflect a disagreement between Andy
> >and myself about Effective Boolean Value. I wanted to stick with
> >the XQuery semantics but Andy pointed out that they changed since
> >I used them to establish the SPARQL EBV rules.
> 
> Hmm... before or after XQuery went to last call?

dunno. should have looked then, but i didn't

> Did they highlight the change in a changes section of their CR?
> I wonder if they have a test case that ensures that implementors
> will notice the change.

I'm inclined to let this bookkeeping/auditing detail drop unless
I come accross relevent facts while recovering now.

> > The previous rules
> >were basically, TRUE for all but a few known types with known FALSE
> >values. The new rules have type errors for all but known types. I'm
> >happy to switch to the new rules, but the WG voted on the old ones.
> >DanC, advice?
> >
> 
> Please just add some (more) "red text" about this ... anything that you 
> and Andy
> are both comfortable publishing...  and continue toward publication.

Sounds good; working on that now.
-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.