review of WSDL 1.1 (thumbs up pending two minor points)

I went through http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wsdl11/ . I
bring up a couple issues here, but I think they can be resolved
quickly. Once answered, I'm quite happy publishing. I'd like the chair
to note that, if there's a vote to publish, the WG is agreeing that
they've decided to use the Wiki "to share and develop code
examples". (Perhaps I simply didn't notice that the WG already agreed
to this.)

[[
The Working Group has chosen to use a Wiki page to share and develop
code examples [WSDL11-WIKI] of using the WSDL 1.1 to implement the
SPARQL Protocol for RDF, either as a service endpoint or as a client.
]]

I've pestered some WSDL spec gurus to see if "equivilent" is the right
word in
[[
It is the intention of the Working Group that the interfaces, types,
faults, and operations defined non-normatively in this WSDL 1.1
document are equivalent to those normatively defined in WSDL 2.0 by
the SPARQL Protocol.
]]

next up is DanC:
          * ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
	    contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias
-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.