Comment: SPARQL Query conformance section

We have a coment asking for a conformancy section in SPARQL Query:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jul/0027

DanC, you hvae argued that we should leave conformance to the protocol
spec (or an argument near that). I think the WG has tacitly or
activley agreed. Could you send mail to the commentor arguing your
position?
-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.