- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:58:17 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
plain text:
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
+ [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2005-12-13T14:30Z
([2]local times)
o teleconference bridge: [3]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ supplementary IRC chat: [4]#dawg
o [5]log to appear
+ scribe: EricP
+ PROPOSED: to accept [6]Data Access -- 6 Dec 2005 as a true
record
+ roll call ([7]wg membership) regrets: KendallC
+ next meeting: 20 Dec. scribe?
+ Let's continue these without discussion:
o ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to
protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the
section in rq23 itself
o ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in
protocol spec
+ Let's note these done without discussion: @@
+ Comments on the agenda?
sorry it's so late.
2. issues#rdfSemantics
Withdraw all these actions and close the issue without changing
the spec? Any volunteers to respond to the commentors?
+ ACTION: PatH to sketch tests that characterize impact of
semantics work; esp how examples in [8]comment from pfps
are handled by recent proposals.
+ ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's draft,
listing what will change with the new semantics
understanding, and what will not
+ ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft,
listing what will change with the new semantics
understanding ...
o note [9]SPARQL Semantics document Enrico Franconi
(Monday, 24 October)
+ ACTION Bijan: estimate impact of "abstract syntax
entailment" etc. on WG test harness
o for reference: [10]Oedipus test case (OWL-DL
semantics)
3. issues#valueTesting
+ ACTION: EricP to mail the WG asking about URIs for
functions, re comment 2005-10-26T22:08:10Z from r.newman
PROPOSED: to adopt the design in v1.574 [11]section 11, Tests,
(striking the red text and adding including the green text). See
also: [12]some test sketches
4. issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
+ ACTION: KendallC to propose revised WSDL descripton of
SPARQL protocol
+ ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t.
WSDL 2.0 constraints
+ ACTION: DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to our WSDL
comments. Hm... [13]PaulD 15 Nov.
also: [14]query by reference Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 15
November)
5. comment: [15]SPARQL Results Format and Unbound Variables
discussion thru [16]Jeen 12 Dec
6. Toward CR
+ cf [17]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases...
schedule review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
+ [18]lc status (also: lists in editor's drafts)
+ Charmod conformance; my [19]OK? message has a forward
reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG review
in reply
+ The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely addressed by
a presentation from Melton at XML2005
+ dependencies: [20]ietf-types review of
application/sparql-results+xml , [21]ietf-types review of
application/sparql-query
7. protocol testing update
+ ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
results
8. test suite maintenance
+ ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with
negative tests [recorded in
[22]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
+ ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
+ ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
comment on truth tables in [23]commentor's message
+ ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for
later WG approval
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=13&month=12&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0
[3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[5] http://www.w3.org/2005/13/13-dawg-irc
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/att-0330/06-dawg-minutes.html__charset_us-ascii
[7] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0036
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0498.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0329.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Nov/0041
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0231.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/mid/42F4CEEB.5090306@umd.edu
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0325.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
[20] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html
[21] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 21:58:26 UTC