- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:39:15 -0600
- To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna.biz>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, kendall@monkeyfist.com
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 16:29 +0100, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > Following up on myself here. This discussion is of relevance to Ron > Alford's comments to the WG regarding unbound variables in the SPARQL > query results XML format (see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0043 ). [...] > Do we have enough data here to perhaps put it on next telcon's agenda > and make a decision one way or the other? I'd like to think so. But I don't see a crisp proposal. Can you state the proposal in a paragraph or so, along with a test case/example? Or can you update the editor's draft? > Cheers, > > Jeen > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0043 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 21:39:31 UTC