- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:15:56 +0200
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
[...] >> The definition is plain wrong, since you don't want to "RDF merge" bnodes >> coming from the graph, just the ones in the template: >> >> CONSTRUCT { ?x :looks ?y } with answer set [?x/_:a,?y/:here], >> [?x/_:a,?y/:there] >> >> results in the graph >> >> _:a :looks :here . _:a1 :looks :there . >> >> where the coreference on _:a is lost. >> > > What you outline looks right - Not when I run cwm test.n3 -think -sparql=test.rq where test.n3 is @prefix : <test#> . _:a :test :here. _:a :test :there. and test.rq is PREFIX : <test#> CONSTRUCT { ?x :looks ?y } WHERE { ?x :test ?y } Cwm gives [ :looks :here, :there ]. Also when I run euler test.n3 -nope -think -query test.rq euler gives _:a_0_ :looks :here. _:a_0_ :looks :there. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 15:37:45 UTC