- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:43:30 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:38:55AM -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > > > On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Jeen Broekstra wrote: > > >There are still a number of possible reasons I can think of to stick > >with the last call design however: > > > > 1. It has been implemented already and changing it will break > > existing tools (but hey, we're a working draft, what do you > > expect?). > > 2. The collapsed form esp. will make the data structure more > > irregular and therefore possibly harder to understand, esp. for > > people with table/SQL background. > > > >I personally find neither reason particularly compelling, but I'd like > >to hear the WG's opinion on this, if any. > > I agree, neither reason is compelling (and I'm not even sure I agree > with them, but that's beside the point). +1, though I'd like to see how much more it complicates XSLT processing, as that was more of a concern IIRC. - Steve
Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 15:44:00 UTC