Re: 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note

On Nov 15, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> The WG decided to publish 1.538 + EBV/valueTesting note, plus
> ... today. The note was to reflect a disagreement between Andy
> and myself about Effective Boolean Value. I wanted to stick with
> the XQuery semantics but Andy pointed out that they changed since
> I used them to establish the SPARQL EBV rules.

Hmm... before or after XQuery went to last call?

Did they highlight the change in a changes section of their CR?
I wonder if they have a test case that ensures that implementors
will notice the change.

>  The previous rules
> were basically, TRUE for all but a few known types with known FALSE
> values. The new rules have type errors for all but known types. I'm
> happy to switch to the new rules, but the WG voted on the old ones.
> DanC, advice?

Please just add some (more) "red text" about this ... anything that you 
and Andy
are both comfortable publishing...  and continue toward publication.

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:52:43 UTC