- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:22:51 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:52:17 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> Steve Harris wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:08:32 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> >><insert type="request for negative syntax tests"/>please<insert>
> >
> >
> >Ack. I'm thinking of a :sense property which takes values :positive or
> >:negative, sound OK?
> >
> >- Steve
> >
>
> I'd prefer it done as classes because that is how I do it at the moment:
>
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jena/ARQ/Vocabularies/test-manifest-x.n3?rev=1.2&view=markup
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0246
Sorry, must have missed that. Id really rather it wasn't done in that way
though, as it limits negative tests to sytax only. Having it as a class is
OK, but why not a seperate class structure:
:test a :QueryTest ;
a :NegativeTest
?
- Steve
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:24:11 UTC