public-prov-wg@w3.org from May 2012 by author

Curt Tilmes

• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Sunday, 20 May)

Daniel Garijo

• Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: scribe for today? (Thursday, 3 May)

Eric

• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)

Evain, Jean-Pierre

• RE: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions (Saturday, 12 May)
• Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (Tuesday, 8 May)
• A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (was: Complexity/simplicty redux) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Complexity/simplicty redux (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Complexity/simplicty redux (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: Revised PROV-AQ (Friday, 4 May)
• Revised PROV-AQ (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Fwd: Going for simplicity (was: actions related to collections) (Tuesday, 1 May)

Ivan Herman

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-375 (owl-property-links): link to OWL property types in PROV-O [Ontology] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm (Monday, 7 May)
• Mini-mini comment on prov-dm (Monday, 7 May)
• Question on permitted datatypes (Monday, 7 May)
• Another prov-o comment/question (Monday, 7 May)
• Minor editorial comment on Prov-o (Monday, 7 May)

James Cheney

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-343 (account-objections): Objections regarding Account [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics] (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-354 (all-or-nothing-for-optional-arguments): Adopt an all-or-nothing approach to optional positional arguments [prov-n] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-353 (optional-id-syntactic-marker): Introduce a syntactic marker for when optional id is expressed [prov-n] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS (Thursday, 10 May)

James Frew

• IPAW 2012: hotel rates expire tomorrow! (Thursday, 24 May)
• Call for Participation: IPAW 2012 (Wednesday, 23 May)

Jim McCusker

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Proposal for restructuring PROV-DM into core+extensions (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)

Jun Zhao

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 1 May)

Kai Eckert

• Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Saturday, 12 May)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: prov-dm: outstanding issues to close (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Fwd: provenance working group draft specs - ready for review (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: prov-wg: Telcon Agenda May 3, 2012 (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (Thursday, 3 May)
• [provo] Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] (Tuesday, 1 May)

Luc Moreau

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-364 (collection-constraints-bugs): Collection constraint has wrong syntax for memberOf [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 31 May)
• ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: revised prov-dm document (ISSUE-331) (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-133 (YolandaGil): Producing and delivering resources as part of provenance in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-376 (rename-responsibility): Renaming Responsibility (to Behalf?) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 31 May 2012 (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Fwd: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Monday, 28 May)
• delegation definition (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: respec: misbalanced appendices (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics] (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: generation by two distinct activities? (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 18 May)
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-17 (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Thursday, 17 May)
• today's call: scribe required, please (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: generation by two distinct activities? (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 May 2012 (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-295 (TLebo): hasAnnotation [ a prov:Note ] [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-88 (Provenance-container): Provenance container seems an unnecessary concept (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 May 2012 (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Saturday, 12 May)
• provenance of provenance (Thursday, 10 May)
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-10 (Thursday, 10 May)
• Fwd: Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (Thursday, 10 May)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 May 2012 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)
• prov-dm: outstanding issues to close (Tuesday, 8 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-362 (altOf-www): alternateOf is to handle levels of specificity, not the wild wild west of WWW URI selection [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (Tuesday, 8 May)
• new signatures for derivation relations (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 2 May)

Miles, Simon

• RE: Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Definition of role (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: delegation definition (Wednesday, 30 May)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• RE: delegation definition (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: today's call: scribe required, please (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: provenance of provenance (Monday, 14 May)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: Revised PROV-AQ (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Revised PROV-AQ (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Revised PROV-AQ (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: prov-wg: Telcon Agenda May 3, 2012 (Thursday, 3 May)

Paolo Missier

• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)

Paolo Ncl

• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)

Paul Groth

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• prov-wg: Telecon Minutes May 24, 2012 (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• prov-wg: Telecon Agenda May 25, 2012 (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Monday, 21 May)
• Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] (Saturday, 19 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: A proposal for reorganizing PROV materials (was: Complexity/simplicty redux) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• prov-wg: Telcon Minutes May 3, 2012 (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: proposal separating collections (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Complexity/simplicty redux (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Saturday, 5 May)
• proposal separating collections (Saturday, 5 May)
• Fwd: provenance working group draft specs - ready for review (Saturday, 5 May)
• Re: announcement email for prov specs (Friday, 4 May)
• announcement email for prov specs (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: scribe for today? (Thursday, 3 May)
• scribe for today? (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• prov-wg: Telcon Agenda May 3, 2012 (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Fwd: Going for simplicity (was: actions related to collections) (Tuesday, 1 May)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-386: 3.2 missing terms in turtle examples (Wednesday, 30 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Monday, 28 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 24 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-382 (jzhao): Qualification patters in prov-o section 3.3 [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-380 (start-hadActivity): Missing hadActivity reference on Start [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Friday, 18 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-377 (rl-plus-plus-justify): All RL "violations" justified appendix [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-376 (rename-responsibility): Renaming Responsibility (to Behalf?) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-375 (owl-property-links): link to OWL property types in PROV-O [Ontology] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-374 (member-membership-indirection): indirection for Dictionary members [Ontology] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Monday, 7 May)
• PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 1 May)

Reza B'Far (Oracle)

• Re: delegation definition (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 11 May)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-315 (dgarijo): Mapping of subclass relationships [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: announcement email for prov specs (Friday, 4 May)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: announcement email for prov specs (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] (Monday, 7 May)
• RE: proposal separating collections (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 2 May)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-374 (member-membership-indirection): indirection for Dictionary members [Ontology] (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: specialization/alternate in prov-dm (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: scribe for today? (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-365 (membership-as-insertion-too-limitting): Collection constraint membership-as-insertion too limitting [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-204 (end-of-entity): What marks the end of an entity? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: [provo] Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-334 (define-qualification-pattern): Qualification Pattern was used, used in bold font in its first occurrence, but never defined. [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: [owl changed] ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-351 (membership-complete): memberOf complete attribute missing [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 2 May)

Tim Lebo

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 1 May)

Timothy Lebo

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-385 (haProvenanceIn-complexity): The hasProvenbanceIn relation is over-complicated [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 29 May)
• reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)
• respec: misbalanced appendices (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-375 (owl-property-links): link to OWL property types in PROV-O [Ontology] (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-380 (start-hadActivity): Missing hadActivity reference on Start [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: [owl changed] prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Monday, 21 May)
• [owl changed] justified: wasAttributedTo subpropertyOf tracedTo (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: [owl changed] prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-343 (account-objections): Objections regarding Account [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 21 May)
• prov-o meeting today - reminder (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-362 (altOf-www): alternateOf is to handle levels of specificity, not the wild wild west of WWW URI selection [prov-dm] (Thursday, 17 May)
• [owl changed] Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS (Thursday, 17 May)
• prov-o team agenda items for next week (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: generation by two distinct activities? (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Review and next steps on PROV-CONSTRAINTS (Thursday, 17 May)
• generation by two distinct activities? (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-213 (prov-sem-events): Alignment of events in PROV-DM vs PROV-SEM [Formal Semantics] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-283 (TLebo): Account, Note, Plan and Location subclasses of Entity? [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/9 Issues (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Fwd: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-295 (TLebo): hasAnnotation [ a prov:Note ] [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• prov:value versus KeyValuePair (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• InstantaneousEvent disjointness (Tuesday, 15 May)
• [owl changed] hadQuoter hadQuoted and wasApprovedBy (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• [owl changed] InstantaneousEvent disjoints (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] (Monday, 14 May)
• [owl changed] Re: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] (Monday, 14 May)
• prov-o telecon today (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: provenance of provenance (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 10 May)
• [owl changed] invalidatedAtTime and generatedAtTime now functional (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-372 (qualified-property-chains): ( prov:qualifedUsage prov:entity ) rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:used (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-89 (what-entity-attributes): How do we find the attributes of an entity? [Formal Model] (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: [provo] Difference between wasInformedBy and wasStartedByActivity (ttl examples) (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Another prov-o comment/question (Monday, 7 May)
• prov-o telecon today (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 1 May)

Tom De Nies

• Re: delegation definition (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 15 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2012 22:53:27 UTC