- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:43:02 +0100
- To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On 05/15/2012 04:35 PM, Stephan Zednik wrote: > On May 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > > >> Stephan and WG, >> >> Given Luc's response about Dictionaries providing structure to Entities, can we go with pairKey and pairValue? >> > I think this is the best solution forward. > +1 Luc > --Stephan > > >> Any more concerns? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >>>> Leaning towards Luc and Stephan, what about >>>> >>>> [ >>>> a prov:KeyValuePair; >>>> prov:pairKey "goalie"; >>>> prov:pairValue :joe_the_tank; >>>> ] >>>> >>>> I think the property should be named by the role, not its range - otherwise we'd have pairString which is odd. >>>> >>> I think this goes back to my preference for prov:KeyEntityPair over prov:KeyValuePair. >>> >>> Why can only entities be the value in a KeyValuePair? >>> >>> --Stephan >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:43:45 UTC