W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:16:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4FA7F55F.8080103@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

good reference for the example, thank you.

Regarding modelling the publication process: I don't see PROV as suitable for modelling process and process rules in particular, 
rather for recording observed process events. Unless I misunderstand your question?


On 5/7/12 2:58 PM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> I see that the Prov-DM uses the W3C publication process as an example. Some of the terms referred to in the document actually exist, better use those:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf
> I know it is a bit sketchy, and should be updated, but it is a start. There is at least a class for WD, PR, etc.
> Challenge: model the whole W3C publication process with Prov-O... looking at this what I tried to describe (and I did not really succeed) is to interpret things like: a some publications occur only when the W3C management agrees, on a transition call, that the document is fine for publication (which is the case for, eg, Candidate Recommendations...)
> Ivan
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 16:17:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:14 UTC