Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization

Hi,

I am basically in favour of the changes proposed, with a few minor points:

- definitely keep one single document. This is in line with other comments

- "extended" is a good way to put it, as opposed to "advanced"

- what's in 2.2.3? is is where the collections live?

- importantly what are these /patterns/??   these have always been constructs, relations, etc. Patterns to me are particular 
compositions of these that are designed to achieve a particular effect. I think these are not patterns.

Regards,
   -Paolo


>
>
>     On May 20, 2012, at 6:01 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
>
>     > Hi All,
>     >
>     > During last week's telcon [1] the chairs were tasked to come-up with a
>     > proposal that tried to reflect consensus on reorganization of the data
>     > model. This would take into account both Graham's proposal [2] as well
>     > as the WG discusion and prior agreements.
>     >
>     > We've come up with with the following proposal:
>     >
>     > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvDM_ConsensusProposal
>     >
>     > We hope this reflects a consensus with the working group and something
>     > we could proceed on. Is this a good foundation to proceed?
>     >
>     > Thanks
>     > Paul
>     >
>     >
>     > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-05-17
>     > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvDM_Proposal_for_restructuring
>     >
>     >
>
>
>


-- 
-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier