- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:06:52 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
After weeks of discussion on phone and email, 1) prov:value has been renamed to prov:pairValue prov:key has been renamed to prov:pairKey http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/215238f50bd5 2) prov:value was reintroduced as DM's "value" (and rdf:value) http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/b5caabaf5a5b Regards, Tim On May 15, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > > On 05/15/2012 04:35 PM, Stephan Zednik wrote: >> On May 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> >> >>> Stephan and WG, >>> >>> Given Luc's response about Dictionaries providing structure to Entities, can we go with pairKey and pairValue? >>> >> I think this is the best solution forward. >> > > +1 > > Luc > >> --Stephan >> >> >>> Any more concerns? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Leaning towards Luc and Stephan, what about >>>>> >>>>> [ >>>>> a prov:KeyValuePair; >>>>> prov:pairKey "goalie"; >>>>> prov:pairValue :joe_the_tank; >>>>> ] >>>>> >>>>> I think the property should be named by the role, not its range - otherwise we'd have pairString which is odd. >>>>> >>>> I think this goes back to my preference for prov:KeyEntityPair over prov:KeyValuePair. >>>> >>>> Why can only entities be the value in a KeyValuePair? >>>> >>>> --Stephan >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 18:08:22 UTC