- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:37:14 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Closed. Thanks, Ivan. -Tim On May 16, 2012, at 3:46 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Thanks Tim. Yes, the issue can be closed... > > Cheers > > Ivan > > On May 15, 2012, at 20:56 , Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> Ivan, >> >> Thank you for pointing out the inconsistent flow. >> >> The draft at >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/3acc7d101d59/ontology/Overview.html#description-expanded-terms >> >> should address your comment. >> >> May we close the issue? >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> Resent-From: public-prov-wg@w3.org >>> From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> >>> Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] >>> Date: May 8, 2012 9:11:12 AM EDT >>> To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> >>> >>> Hi, I just modified the example as suggested. >>> The issue is now pending review, I think we can close it. >>> >>> Best, >>> Daniel >>> >>> 2012/5/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> >>> PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/373 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: PROV-O HTML >>> >>> There is a nice progression from the simple ('starting point') terms via the expanded one to the qualified ones. However... in 3.2 the example uses prov:qualifiedGeneration although, at that point, the reader does not have any idea what that means. It is probably not really important in this example anyway; I would propose to remove it. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:37:53 UTC