- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:37:14 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Closed.
Thanks, Ivan.
-Tim
On May 16, 2012, at 3:46 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Thanks Tim. Yes, the issue can be closed...
>
> Cheers
>
> Ivan
>
> On May 15, 2012, at 20:56 , Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
>> Ivan,
>>
>> Thank you for pointing out the inconsistent flow.
>>
>> The draft at
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/3acc7d101d59/ontology/Overview.html#description-expanded-terms
>>
>> should address your comment.
>>
>> May we close the issue?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> Resent-From: public-prov-wg@w3.org
>>> From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
>>> Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]
>>> Date: May 8, 2012 9:11:12 AM EDT
>>> To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>>>
>>> Hi, I just modified the example as suggested.
>>> The issue is now pending review, I think we can close it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> 2012/5/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/373
>>>
>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>> On product: PROV-O HTML
>>>
>>> There is a nice progression from the simple ('starting point') terms via the expanded one to the qualified ones. However... in 3.2 the example uses prov:qualifiedGeneration although, at that point, the reader does not have any idea what that means. It is probably not really important in this example anyway; I would propose to remove it.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 15:37:53 UTC