Re: [owl changed] prov:value versus KeyValuePair

I've closed this issue because the proposed (and accepted) solution was implemented.

Regards,
Tim

On May 21, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> Tracker, this was for ISSUE-363
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> On May 17, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> 
>> After weeks of discussion on phone and email,
>> 
>> 1)
>> prov:value has been renamed to prov:pairValue
>> prov:key has been renamed to prov:pairKey
>> 
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/215238f50bd5
>> 
>> 
>> 2)
>> prov:value was reintroduced as DM's "value" (and rdf:value)
>> 
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/b5caabaf5a5b
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> On May 15, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 05/15/2012 04:35 PM, Stephan Zednik wrote:
>>>> On May 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Stephan and WG,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Given Luc's response about Dictionaries providing structure to Entities, can we go with pairKey and pairValue?
>>>>> 
>>>> I think this is the best solution forward.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Luc
>>> 
>>>> --Stephan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Any more concerns?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tim
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Leaning towards Luc and Stephan, what about
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [
>>>>>>> a prov:KeyValuePair;
>>>>>>> prov:pairKey      "goalie";
>>>>>>> prov:pairValue  :joe_the_tank;
>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think the property should be named by the role, not its range - otherwise we'd have pairString which is odd.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think this goes back to my preference for prov:KeyEntityPair over prov:KeyValuePair.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why can only entities be the value in a KeyValuePair?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Stephan
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 19:05:52 UTC