- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:35:17 -0600
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
On May 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Stephan and WG, > > Given Luc's response about Dictionaries providing structure to Entities, can we go with pairKey and pairValue? I think this is the best solution forward. --Stephan > > Any more concerns? > > Thanks, > Tim > > > >>> Leaning towards Luc and Stephan, what about >>> >>> [ >>> a prov:KeyValuePair; >>> prov:pairKey "goalie"; >>> prov:pairValue :joe_the_tank; >>> ] >>> >>> I think the property should be named by the role, not its range - otherwise we'd have pairString which is odd. >> >> I think this goes back to my preference for prov:KeyEntityPair over prov:KeyValuePair. >> >> Why can only entities be the value in a KeyValuePair? >> >> --Stephan > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:36:41 UTC