- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:46:28 +0100
- To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|d612c20a56cbf945b39352838346af0eo4HDkU08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FB644A4>
Hi Khalid, Comments below On 05/17/2012 10:54 AM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is what I think: > > +1 for dropping 'account' > +1 for introducing 'bundle' (bundle has a weaker semantics than > account, which I like, the definition of bundle needs to be slightly > modified as indicated below) > +1 for dropping hasAnnotation and Note > +1 for adding the component on bundles > > Regarding the section on bundle in > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html: > > - The definition of bundle states that "A bundle is a named set of > provenance descriptions, and is itself an entity, so allowing > provenance of provenance to be expressed.". I don't think a bundle is > necessarily an entity. A bundle becomes an entity only when somebody > decides to describe its provenance. This applies to anything, not just > bundles. Therefore, I would suggest reformulating the definition to > something in the lines of "A bundle is a named set of provenance > descriptions.". If there is a need, then more details specifying that > a bundle is an entity when its provenance is described can be > elaborated when presenting the example specifying the provenance of > the bundle created by Alice. > There is a precedent for this. We said a Plan is an entity. We said a Collection is an entity. Why not a bundle? > - I think that the description of the provenance locator construct is > outside the scope of the data model. If the group feels that there is > a need for having such a construct, then I think that it will be more > appropriate to try to adapt it and include it within the PAQ document. > My PASOA experience is that we need to make such assertions for provenance to be incrementally browseable. The relation also provides a notion of alternate. For these reasons, I feel it belongs to the data model and ontology. > Typo: in the definition of provenance location: relatation -> relation > > Thanks, khalid > > Thanks, Luc >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote: >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> We are seeking feedback on text regarding bundles (allowing >> provenance >> of provenance to be expressed). >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html >> >> It is addressing ISSUES-257, ISSUE-260, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-297. >> We will respond to these issues individually, shortly. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 12:47:08 UTC