Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm

On May 7, 2012, at 18:16 , Paolo Missier wrote:

> Ivan
> 
> good reference for the example, thank you.
> 
> Regarding modelling the publication process: I don't see PROV as suitable for modelling process and process rules in particular, rather for recording observed process events. Unless I misunderstand your question?

No you do not, and I understand. 

Ivan

> 
> -Paolo
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/7/12 2:58 PM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> I see that the Prov-DM uses the W3C publication process as an example. Some of the terms referred to in the document actually exist, better use those:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf
>> 
>> I know it is a bit sketchy, and should be updated, but it is a start. There is at least a class for WD, PR, etc.
>> 
>> Challenge: model the whole W3C publication process with Prov-O... looking at this what I tried to describe (and I did not really succeed) is to interpret things like: a some publications occur only when the W3C management agrees, on a transition call, that the document is fine for publication (which is the case for, eg, Candidate Recommendations...)
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----------  ~oo~  --------------
> Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
> School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
> http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 11:00:33 UTC