Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]

Thanks Tim. Yes, the issue can be closed...

Cheers

Ivan

On May 15, 2012, at 20:56 , Timothy Lebo wrote:

> Ivan,
> 
> Thank you for pointing out the inconsistent flow.
> 
> The draft at 
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/3acc7d101d59/ontology/Overview.html#description-expanded-terms
> 
> should address your comment.
> 
> May we close the issue?
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> Resent-From: public-prov-wg@w3.org
>> From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
>> Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]
>> Date: May 8, 2012 9:11:12 AM EDT
>> To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>> 
>> Hi, I just modified the example as suggested.
>> The issue is now pending review, I think we can close it.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 2012/5/7 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
>> PROV-ISSUE-373: trim qualified from "3.2 expanded" [PROV-O HTML]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/373
>> 
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: PROV-O HTML
>> 
>> There is a nice progression from the simple ('starting point') terms via the expanded one to the qualified ones. However... in 3.2 the example uses prov:qualifiedGeneration although, at that point, the reader does not have any idea what that means. It is probably not really important in this example anyway; I would propose to remove it.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 07:43:22 UTC