- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:55:01 +0100
- To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|ea061f113a6d1deba3e9eaf8fb1ad6efo4HDy408L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FB646A5>
Hi Satya, See below On 05/17/2012 04:57 PM, Satya Sahoo wrote: > Hi Luc, > > In a sense, the approach is similar to Tim's approach > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Using_graphs_to_model_Accounts, > where he was using a hash as the graph identifier. If the > descriptions change, so does the hash. I think using hash is too > strong > requirement, hence, we have regular identifiers. (A secure > version could use them). > > If an application does not wish to distinguish between two bundles > (note: a bundle does not have state!), ... then > it shouldn't produce bundles. There is no requirement to generate > bundles. > > I did not understand - is there a construct other than bundle for > handling multiple provenance assertions together? If bundle is the > only construct available then we need to avoid "over-specifying" it. > > >> 2. I am not sure why provenance location, a function for >> accessing provenance and very often application/domain dependent, >> should be part of DM? "A provenance locator is information that >> helps locate provenance descriptions. It may identify a service, >> or may consist of a URI where provenance descriptions can be >> found." What if location of provenance of an entity or activity >> is written down as set of instructions on file (or paper) - >> provenance of a car is located in a file in the filing cabinet of >> manufacturer? In this case, the application cannot use the >> currently defined hasProvenanceIn construct. > > There is no claim that we covering all possible ways of accessing > provenance. That's why we have attributes to allow other ways > to be expressed (you could encode there your instructions to find > a paper for instance). > > So, "target", "service", "provenance" (very uncomfortable with this > label btw) are just specific examples of the generic "attributes" - > this is not clear from the current signature. > In fact, to be closer to the PAQ i have renamed them service-uri and provenance-uri. Hopefully it helps. Luc > Thanks. > > Best, > Satya > > > > Luc > > >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best, >> Satya >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Luc Moreau >> <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote: >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> We are seeking feedback on text regarding bundles (allowing >> provenance >> of provenance to be expressed). >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html >> >> It is addressing ISSUES-257, ISSUE-260, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-297. >> We will respond to these issues individually, shortly. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel:+44 23 8059 4487 <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%204487> > University of Southampton fax:+44 23 8059 2865 <tel:%2B44%2023%208059%202865> > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 12:55:37 UTC