- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:02:06 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi, This (old) issue appears to have been addressed already, by adding the suggested constraints on wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf. Is there any objection to closing it? --James On Jan 19, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi all, > > Find a new figure and constraints for wasAssociatedWith(a,ag) and wasStartedBy(a,ag). > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#constraint-summary2 > > Feedback welcome! > > Luc > > On 01/17/2012 12:40 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/221 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: prov-dm >> >> For completeness, we should define ordering constraint for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf. >> >> >> For wasAssociatedWith(a,ag), it feels that ag must have some overlap with a. >> >> >> For actedOnBehalfOf(ag1,ag2,a), it seem that ag2 should have existed before the overlap between ag1 and a. >> >> >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > > -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 15:02:58 UTC