- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:01:28 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|5c9e92145f8a5dbfd35d69c9d21e3e0ao4YA1X08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FC5E1E8>
Hi Khalid, All relations association/attribution/delegation are "capturing a notion of responsibility" in PROV. It's useful to make this explicit in the definition. Luc On 05/25/2012 05:41 PM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote: > > +1 > > The definition is clear. However, I am wondering if we really need, > within the model, to specify who is responsible for the outcome of the > delegated work. In other words, wouldn't it be better to defined > delegation as: > > /"Delegation is the assignment of authority to an agent (by itself or > by another agent) to carry out a specific activity as a delegate or > representative/." > > Thanks, khalid > > On 24/05/2012 22:04, Luc Moreau wrote: >> >> All, >> Today, we decided to replace the term Responsibility by Delegation. >> Inspired by suggestions from Tim and Stephan, I drafted a definition: >> >> /Delegation is the assignment of authority to an agent (by itself or >> by another agent) to carry out a specific activity as a delegate or >> representative, while the agent that it represents remains >> responsible for the outcome of the delegated work. >> / >> Thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 09:02:07 UTC