Re: PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML]

Hi TIm,

This looks cool. I was wondering if really what you want is "class can
be used with relationship" cross reference? Or would this be too much?

thanks
Paul

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> wg,
>
> More cross referencing was added to link "less direct" relationships between
> classes and properties.
>
>
>
> For example,
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/3acc7d101d59/ontology/Overview.html#Usage
>
> now shows:
>
> a domain of prov:hadRole parent is in domain of prov:atTime prov:entity
>
>
>
> This should help the use of, in particular, the Involvement subclasses.
>
> Some questions:
>
> 1) Are these new cross references useful?
>
> 2) Are there other cross references that you would find useful?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail
> [PROV-O HTML]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/350
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: PROV-O HTML
>
> Anything with a union domain needs to be fixed in the cross reference
> script.
>
> e.g.
> http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#hadActivity
> has
>
> has domain
>
>        prov:Involvement
>        TODO: one of a few classes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 13:36:09 UTC