Re: Revised PROV-AQ

Hey Graham,

On Thursday 03 May 2012 22:19:43 Graham Klyne wrote:
> Olaf,
> 
> It seems I misunderstood what you were suggesting.
> 
> I'd be quite happy to remove the qualifying text "also referred to as
> resource on the Web" in the definition of resource - I wasn't especially
> enamoured of it, but it seemed mostly harmless at the time.
> 
> Is this (removal of text as indicated above) what you are suggesting?

Yes, that's exactly what I'm suggesting ;-)

Best,
Olaf


 
> Thanks.
> 
> #g
> --
> 
> On 03/05/2012 20:17, Olaf Hartig wrote:
> > Hey Graham,
> > 
> > Based on your recent changes I closed ISSUE-359 ISSUE-360 and ISSUE-361
> > 
> > I'm not entirely happy with the change that you did in the context of
> > ISSUE-358 [1]. More precisely, I don't like the first part of the current
> > 
> > definition of 'Resource' in Sec.1.1. This part says:
> >         "also referred to as resource on the Web"
> > 
> > I propose to completely remove this part because our understanding of
> > 'resource' (in line with the understanding in AWWW) is broader than just
> > resources that are on the Web.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Olaf
> > 
> > 
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/358
> > 
> > On Thursday 03 May 2012 18:42:54 Graham Klyne wrote:
> >> All,
> >> 
> >> Since the teleconference today, I've made a couple of small further edits
> >> to address outstanding issues 360 and 361 (issues submitted by Olaf).
> >> 
> >> The current version of the document is now:
> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/82ac0204e878/paq/working/prov-aq.html
> >> 
> >> At this point, there are just two outstanding issues, which I think may
> >> have been rendered moot by other changes to the document and to the data
> >> model.
> >> 
> >> This is what we are proposing to release as the next working draft.
> >> 
> >> #g
> >> --

Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 07:05:44 UTC