W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

RE: proposal separating collections

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 19:26:39 -0600
To: "'Paul Groth'" <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "'Provenance Working Group WG'" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <09cd01cd2bf0$75104b80$5f30e280$@rpi.edu>
If we define collections (including dictionaries) in an extension to PROV-O with a different namespace it would resolve the current issue with dual usage of prov:value in the ontology (ISSUE-363) and would read very clean.

I support the suggestion to move collections and dictionaries out of the core provenance documents and into a recommendation and extension of prov-o.


-----Original Message-----
From: pgroth@gmail.com [mailto:pgroth@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paul Groth
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 5:46 AM
To: Provenance Working Group WG
Subject: proposal separating collections

Hi All,

In our last telcon, there was an agenda item to discuss the possibility of creating a separate document around collections.

Currently, in prov-dm and particularly prov-o, collections take a lot of space to explain. This makes the documents seem unbalanced and the model seem more complicated than it is. Thus, I'm making the following

Make collections a separate document that contains both the content from prov-dm and prov-o. Collections would remain a recommendation.

What do you think?

I would like to vote on this at next week's if we have consensus.

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 01:27:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:14 UTC