- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:40:41 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On May 23, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > I think this would make sense. > > I would put forward the following suggestion. > > 1. None of the mentioned subtypes should have reserved syntax in prov-n > 2. All reserved subtypes should appear in the summary table > 3. All reserved subtypes should appear in UML diagrams (marked with a > stereotype and/or color) to distinguish them from our toplevel classes. I don't have any objections to that. Though, I might prefer the subtypes be omitted from the UML diagrams (up to you and the group). -Tim > > Luc > > On 05/23/2012 05:20 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> Luc, >> >> I thinking adding: >> >> prov:SoftwareAgent no no no >> prov:Organization no no no >> prov:Person no no no >> >> in non-bold would make sense, if one is inclined to add them. >> >> >> That leaves >> EmptyDictionary, which also seems reasonable (unbolded like the rest). >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> >> On May 23, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Tim: >>> Here it is: >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#prov-dm-types-and-relations >>> Luc >>> >>> On 05/23/2012 04:57 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>> >>>> Luc, >>>> >>>> On May 23, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> For revision, hadOriginalSource, and wasQuotedFrom ( >>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-dm-20120503/#term-Revision) >>>>> >>>>> I feel that we shouldn't introduce a special syntax in PROV-N, but we should >>>>> just introduce types: prov:Revision, etc. >>>>> >>>>> This would be inline with the way all other subtypes are handled. >>>>> >>>>> So, the question is: should they all appear in UML diagram and table 4? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Which table 4? (URL, please?) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Luc >>>>> >>>>> On 05/23/2012 01:49 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/383 >>>>>> >>>>>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>>>>> On product: prov-dm >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> PROV-DM defines a variety of subtypes and handles them differently. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some have an explicit prov-n construct (I think for those, it's a legacy >>>>>> of the past, when signatures were not uniform). >>>>>> >>>>>> Some are explicitly represented in UML diagrams, some are not. >>>>>> Some are listed in table 4. >>>>>> >>>>>> PROV-N in UML in Table 4 >>>>>> notation diag >>>>>> >>>>>> wasRevisionOf yes yes yes >>>>>> >>>>>> hadOriginalSource yes yes yes >>>>>> >>>>>> wasQuotedFrom yes yes yes >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:Plan no yes no >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:SoftwareAgent no no no >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:Organization no no no >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:Person no no no >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:Bundle no yes yes >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:Collection no yes yes >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:Dictionary no yes yes >>>>>> >>>>>> prov:EmptyDictionary no no no >>>>>> >>>>>> Suggestions on how to handle them systematically are welcome! >>>>>> >>>>>> Luc >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>>>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Professor Luc Moreau >>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 16:41:43 UTC