Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair

Luc,




>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2) Rename DM's "value" to "chars", inspired by cnt:chars from
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF10/#ContentAsTextClass
>>>>>         
>>> -1
>>> 
>>> I prefer "content" to "chars", but would prefer even more to use prov:value to be consistent with the DM.
>>>     
>> I was proposing to have DM to change "value" to "content" at
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-dm-20120503/#term-attribute-value
>> 
>>   
> 
> I feel that "content" is not really expressing what we want, when we talk
> about immediate value such as int, string, etc. It may work fine for file contents.


I agree, it's not quite right.
I much prefer keeping like rdf:value since it has had ten years to develop in practical use.

-Tim

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:36:02 UTC