W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML]

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:46:07 +0100
Message-ID: <4FBFA93F.8040904@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim, Paul and all,

 From what I understood from yesterday's call, we don't have to sync 
prov-o with prov-dm. Based on this assumption and based on our current 
list of prov-o starting-point terms in section 2, I listed things that 
need to updated in section 3.1 according to my access to [1] at 4.40pm 
UK time today.

- In the updated diagram, it doesn't show prov:wasInvalidatedBy, 
prov:generatedAt, and prov:invalidatedAt. They are listed in section 2. 
This needs to be made consistent. We also miss examples for this.

- The text in section 3.1 still mentions prov:wasStartedByActivity.

- We don't have any explanation about invalidation properties, nor examples.

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html

I think the big inconsistent is now between section 3.1 and terms list 
in section 2. I don't know what the group decision is on this aspect.



On 24/05/2012 10:03, Paul Groth wrote:
> One thing to note here is that we are trying to synchronize prov-o and
> prov-dm "core".  So this may be worth waiting for the agreement on
> what constitutes the core.
> Thanks
> Paul
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Timothy Lebo<lebot@rpi.edu>  wrote:
>> Jun,
>> On May 23, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Jun Zhao wrote:
>>> Hi Tim,
>>> I also updated the powerpoint in our old dropbox with a new starting-point terms slide. Where are your new SVG figures?
>> The SVG figures are now linked from http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o
>> (I recovered from my backup!)
>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML]
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/379
>>>>> Raised by: Jun Zhao
>>>>> On product: PROV-O HTML
>>>>> The diagram and example in this section need to updated according to the updated ontology or the list of starting-point terms in section 2.
>> Regarding the contents of this issue, could you be more specific about what you feel needs to be updated?
>> If you see the disparities already, it's easier to fix them than to find them :-)
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 15:49:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:14 UTC