- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:35:13 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FB12631.7020206@cs.man.ac.uk>
Hi Tim, Unfortunately I won't be able to make it for today's provo telecon. Regarding the action that was on me. I just pushed a new version of the OWL ontology where I added comment (or annotation) to certain properties to justify the hierarchy. Specifically: * prov:involved: the comment associated to this property specify that The relation specified by the object properties, which are sub-properties of prov:involved, can also be specified using the qualification pattern. * prov:wasDerivedFrom: there is an annotation that specify that this property is a particular case of prov:wasTracedTo. * prov:derivationByInsertionFrom, prov:derivationByRemovalFrom, prov:hadOriginalSource, prov:wasQuotedFrom, prov:wasRevisionOf: These properties have now annotation specifying why they are subproperties of prov:wasDerivedFrom * prov:involvee. The comments associated with this property specify that the subproperties of prov:involvee are used to cite the object of an unqualified PROV-O triple whose predicate is a subproperty of prov:involved Thanks, khalid On 14/05/2012 13:50, Timothy Lebo wrote: > prov-o team, > > Reminder of our usual telecon today. > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-05-14#Agenda > > # date: 2012-05-14 > # time: 12pm ET, 5pm GMT > # via Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 695 ("OWL") > # wiki page: > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-05-14 > # titan page: http://titanpad.com/yScPLvx8Np > > > Regards, > Tim >
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 15:35:42 UTC