- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:35:13 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FB12631.7020206@cs.man.ac.uk>
Hi Tim,
Unfortunately I won't be able to make it for today's provo telecon.
Regarding the action that was on me.
I just pushed a new version of the OWL ontology where I added comment
(or annotation) to certain properties to justify the hierarchy.
Specifically:
* prov:involved: the comment associated to this property specify that
The relation specified by the object properties, which are
sub-properties of prov:involved, can also be specified using the
qualification pattern.
* prov:wasDerivedFrom: there is an annotation that specify that this
property is a particular case of prov:wasTracedTo.
* prov:derivationByInsertionFrom, prov:derivationByRemovalFrom,
prov:hadOriginalSource, prov:wasQuotedFrom, prov:wasRevisionOf: These
properties have now annotation specifying why they are subproperties of
prov:wasDerivedFrom
* prov:involvee. The comments associated with this property specify that
the subproperties of prov:involvee are used to cite the object of an
unqualified PROV-O triple whose predicate is a subproperty of prov:involved
Thanks, khalid
On 14/05/2012 13:50, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> prov-o team,
>
> Reminder of our usual telecon today.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-05-14#Agenda
>
> # date: 2012-05-14
> # time: 12pm ET, 5pm GMT
> # via Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 695 ("OWL")
> # wiki page:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-05-14
> # titan page: http://titanpad.com/yScPLvx8Np
>
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 15:35:42 UTC