- From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:57:11 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOMwk6wbtHMNGhZ9NnPC0OfMOBWz3-w-Gjg60D9jic48vy4yYA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Luc, In a sense, the approach is similar to Tim's approach > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Using_graphs_to_model_Accounts, > where he was using a hash as the graph identifier. If the descriptions > change, so does the hash. I think using hash is too strong > requirement, hence, we have regular identifiers. (A secure version could > use them). > > If an application does not wish to distinguish between two bundles (note: > a bundle does not have state!), ... then > it shouldn't produce bundles. There is no requirement to generate bundles. > > I did not understand - is there a construct other than bundle for handling multiple provenance assertions together? If bundle is the only construct available then we need to avoid "over-specifying" it. > > 2. I am not sure why provenance location, a function for accessing > provenance and very often application/domain dependent, should be part of > DM? "A provenance locator is information that helps locate provenance > descriptions. It may identify a service, or may consist of a URI where > provenance descriptions can be found." What if location of provenance of > an entity or activity is written down as set of instructions on file (or > paper) - provenance of a car is located in a file in the filing cabinet of > manufacturer? In this case, the application cannot use the currently > defined hasProvenanceIn construct. > > > There is no claim that we covering all possible ways of accessing > provenance. That's why we have attributes to allow other ways > to be expressed (you could encode there your instructions to find a paper > for instance). > So, "target", "service", "provenance" (very uncomfortable with this label btw) are just specific examples of the generic "attributes" - this is not clear from the current signature. Thanks. Best, Satya > > > Luc > > > > Thanks. > > Best, > Satya > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote: > >> >> Dear all, >> >> We are seeking feedback on text regarding bundles (allowing provenance >> of provenance to be expressed). >> >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html >> >> It is addressing ISSUES-257, ISSUE-260, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-297. >> We will respond to these issues individually, shortly. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > >
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 15:57:42 UTC