- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:41:46 -0400
- To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
On May 15, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Stephan Zednik wrote: > > On May 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> Stephan and WG, >> >> Given Luc's response about Dictionaries providing structure to Entities, can we go with pairKey and pairValue? > > I think this is the best solution forward. Thanks, Stephan. If I hear no other objections, I'll rename them soon so we can close out ISSUE-363 -Tim > > --Stephan > >> >> Any more concerns? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >>>> Leaning towards Luc and Stephan, what about >>>> >>>> [ >>>> a prov:KeyValuePair; >>>> prov:pairKey "goalie"; >>>> prov:pairValue :joe_the_tank; >>>> ] >>>> >>>> I think the property should be named by the role, not its range - otherwise we'd have pairString which is odd. >>> >>> I think this goes back to my preference for prov:KeyEntityPair over prov:KeyValuePair. >>> >>> Why can only entities be the value in a KeyValuePair? >>> >>> --Stephan >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:42:44 UTC