- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:50:49 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
I'm getting the impression that hasAnnotation [ a Note ] is fading away?
I like where Bundles are going.
Please close the issue.
-Tim
On May 15, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> With the draft, I believe that your suggestion is directly supported by. I am
> proposing to close this issue pending your review.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html
>
> On 02/22/2012 06:17 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/260
>>
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: prov-dm
>>
>> Please add a note to section Note to encourage people to use Account / AccountEntity/ Provenance to annotate provenance assertions as a better practice. When using AccountEntity, the annotated thing can be described _directly_ as a single triple instead of using Notes. Notes are very much "scruffy provenance" and do not benefit from the directness afforded by AccountEntity / prov:Provenance.
>>
>> :prov_1 {
>> :simon a prov:Human;
>> prov:hasAnnotation [
>> a prov:Note; ex3:reputation "excellent";
>> rdfs:comment "This is a kludge way to get indirection. Use prov:Provenance instead.";
>> ];
>> }
>>
>> :prov_2 {
>> :simon ex3:reputation "excellent" .
>> }
>>
>> :prov_1 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :first_asserter .
>> :prov_2 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :trust_evaluator_agent.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 13:51:30 UTC