(paul?, Ivan?) I am closing this issue, but another may arise when we do another release. It would be helpful to have the details needed to handle a release, or a confirmation that the prov-o team does not need to do anything. Regards, Tim On May 14, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Using the following, I see that the PROV namespace is now using content negotiation: > > curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" -L http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > curl -H "Accept: text/turtle" -L http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > > these HTTP 200 to prov.rdf and prov.ttl, respectively. > > For future reference, could someone report what was done to achieve this? > More importantly, what steps will need to be taken again when prov-o is updated in future releases? > > Thanks, > Tim > > On Mar 4, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-281 (TLebo): prov-o namspaces are not dereferencable [Ontology] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/281 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: Ontology >> >> The class and property URIs in prov-o need to resolve to an RDF definition when HTTP requested. >> >> >> >> >Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 18:22:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:14 UTC