- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:50:30 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Dear all, All good discussions. But how does this update to wasStartedBy will solve the confusion we have between wasInformedBy and the future wasStartedBy (the old wasStartedByActivity)? I think I'll continue to be confused which one to chose, with trigger or no trigger. Cheers, Jun On 09/05/2012 10:42, Luc Moreau wrote: > yes, good example, I added it to > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/working-copy/wd6-wasStartedBy.html > > > Luc > > On 05/09/2012 09:50 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >> wrote: >>> Hi Stian, Paolo, all, >>> >>> I have encoded the proposal >>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/31e2dc0de82d/model/working-copy/wd6-wasStartedBy.html >>> >>> >>> If people are happy, we can then adjust wasEndedBy similarly. >>> I propose to take a vote on this on Thursday. >> Thanks, this is looking much better and more concise. >> >> Should we add an example about the optional activity? >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/examples/eg-24-prov-o-html-examples/rdf/create/rdf/property_wasStartedByActivity.ttl >> >> simplified as PROV-N: >> >> Example: >> >> In this example, filling fuel was started as a consequence of >> observing the low fuel. The trigger entity is unspecified, it could >> for instance have been the low fuel warning light, the fuel tank >> indicator needle position, or the engine not running properly. >> >> >> activity(ex:filling-fuel) >> activity(ex:observing-low-fuel) >> >> agent(ex:driver, [prov:type="prov:Person" %% xsd:QName) >> wasAssociatedWith(ex:filling-fuel, ex:driver) >> wasAssociatedWith(ex:observing-low-fuel, ex:driver) >> >> wasStartedBy(ex:filling-fuel, -, ex:observing-low-fuel) >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 11:51:01 UTC