- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 10:33:48 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
That is a good use-case. prov:tracedTo is also appropriate when A is not necessarily derived from B, but is still "somehow" influenced by it. It's interpretation in PROV is that B must have been generated before A was generated, and is a hint that B is "in A's provenance past" - perhaps opening for deeper queries to find that path. It can also be an extension point for "other" domain-specific relationships, for instance ex:wasPresent or ex:influenced. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > My concrete use case would be to put things like confidence values on > these links. For example, in one of our systems we "guess" if there is > a tracedto and what to put some confidence value on that link. This is > one of the reasons I like attributes in the model. > > We could do this with derivation so it's not a big deal but the nice > thing is that traced to is transitive... > > cheers > Paul > > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Do you have a concrete use case, in particular, with attributes? >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> On 04/30/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> I think traced-to is useful to sometime assert especially in the case >>> where you want to be very vague about provenance. It's also nice to >>> have attributes so that you can associate other sorts of information >>> with it. >>> >>> However, if others think it's nicer to be inference only then I won't >>> be stand in the way. >>> >>> cheers >>> Paul >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue >>> Tracker<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>>> PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/370 >>>> >>>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>>> On product: prov-dm >>>> >>>> >>>> TracedTo was introduced in the data model so as to have a transitive relation over derivations, etc. It can be inferred. In contrast, its definition as an assertion was not very compelling. In the latest version of prov-constraints, it is only defined as something that can be inferred. >>>> >>>> Really, it looks like a relation that is useful to express queries. >>>> >>>> So, in the spirit of simplification, should we move it out of prov-dm, and have it defined in prov-constraints only. >>>> >>>> At the same time, it could be simplified to a binary relation, since we have no way of inferring attributes for this relation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 09:34:40 UTC