- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:39:14 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim, I am happy with what we will do with the public release. And dealing with versioning for internal releases can wait if you are overwhelmed by other commitment at the moment. -- Jun On 02/05/2012 00:27, Tim Lebo wrote: > Jun, > > The prov.owl will be "copied" to the official w3c website directory when the WD2 is published on Thursday, so there will be no question about what OWL file the HTML is talking about. > > Hopefully, the "dereferencability problem" (which paul took on and we asked Daniel to help with) will be addressed soon, which will provide the latest OWL when requesting the terms' URIs. > > If we want to be explicit about what version of the ontology the HTML is taking about, I can look into exposing that within every compiled draft up to LC that is due in a few weeks. But generally, these are always in sync because the ontology changes less frequently and the HTML is generated much more frequently. > > Please let me know which aspects you need most, so that we can address the right issues soon. > > Regards, > Tim > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 1, 2012, at 11:38, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-371 (junzhao): timestamped provo.owl [PROV-O HTML] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/371 >> >> Raised by: Jun Zhao >> On product: PROV-O HTML >> >> Can we talk about when or whether we will have snapshots for our ontology, like ProvenanceOntology-20120430.owl? Or achieve similar functionality via other mechanisms? >> >> Because our ontology is still work in progress, it is important to have the right ontology content associated with each prov-o spec public release or even work draft. >> >> I think this would be something really nice to have at least for this upcoming public release. >> >> I am happy to discuss more on this. >> >> -- Jun >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 08:39:45 UTC