- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:28:31 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|56563a952ebcad63679134278cfcb0b2o4GFSY08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FB50B0F>
Hi Tim, Below On 05/16/2012 04:44 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Luc, > > within. > > > On May 16, 2012, at 5:34 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > >> Hi Tim, >> Some comment below. >> >> On 05/15/2012 08:34 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>> Luc, >>> >>> Regarding >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html >>> >>> >>> Regarding proposal: >>> >>> +0 to dropping 'account' >>> +0 to introducing 'bundle' to rename 'account' (I think 'account' is >>> a satisfactory name and is more "provenance-y" than the mechanical >>> notion of 'bundle'; note that 'bundle' was first introduced only to >>> distinguish itself from the construct-heave 'account' at the time.) >>> +1 to dropping hasAnnotation and Note >>> +1 to adding the component on bundles (I'm leaning towards 'account' >>> now that we've shucked the heavy widgets it once had.) >>> >>> (I'm happy with either 'bundle' or 'account') >>> >>> >>> Comments on the actual text is below. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> 3) >>> >>> After: >>> "hasProvenanceIn(ex:report1, >>> -, -, -, "http://example.com/some-provenance.pn"^xsd:anyURI)" >>> >>> >>> Could we add another >>> example where your Provenance-URI itself defines a bundle? >>> >>> >>> >>> hasProvenanceIn(ex:report1, ex:bundle34, -, -, "http://example.com/some-provenance.pn"^xsd:anyURI) >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> OK that can be added. I am concerned about the already large number >> of examples in this section. > > > Perhaps, but it was my first question in reading it, and I'd rather > another 2 inches of page to put the concern to bed. > OK, I will come up with something. > >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 4) >>> >>> Can you make the visualization tool use its own URIs for the >>> graphics depicting the reports? >>> >>> entity(ex:report1, [viz:color="orange"]) >>> hasProvenanceIn(ex:report1, obs:bundle7, -, -, -) >>> >>> entity(ex:report2, [viz:color="blue"]) >>> hasProvenanceIn(ex:report2, obs:bundle7, -, -, -) >>> -> >>> >>> entity(tool:graphic1, [viz:color="orange"]) >>> hasProvenanceIn(tool:graphic1, obs:bundle7, ex:report1, -, -) >>> >>> entity(tool:graphic2, [viz:color="blue"]) >>> hasProvenanceIn(ex:graphic2, obs:bundle7, ex:report2, -, -) >> We could, but there is nothing in the model that forbids the current >> example, is there? > > > Correct, this is a matter of modeling your domain, not the PROV model. > I consider the graphics to be distinct from those things that they depict. > I'd rather avoid this domain concern and focus on the fact that we get > an alternateOf for free. > > But, do we agree that tool:graphic1 is an alternate of ex:report1? Given the above comment, I will try to also have an example where identifiers are changed, so that we use target properly. > >>> 5) >>> >>> Why is it necessary that: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "it is necessary for it to have an identifier in the first place >>> (ex:d)." >>> >>> >> >> I am updating the text as follows. Does clarify the issue, or is >> there a more fundamental concern? > > I just didn't understand what it was going to say. > >> >> >> According to their definition, derivations have an optional >> identifier. To express an alternate for a derivation, we need to be >> able to reference it, by means of an identifier. Hence, it is >> necessary for it to have an identifier in the first place (ex:d). > > This makes sense. > > Regards, > Tim Luc > > >> >> >> >> Luc >> >> >>> On May 10, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> We are seeking feedback on text regarding bundles (allowing provenance >>>> of provenance to be expressed). >>>> >>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html >>>> >>>> It is addressing ISSUES-257, ISSUE-260, ISSUE-88, ISSUE-297. >>>> We will respond to these issues individually, shortly. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 14:29:07 UTC