- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:54:14 +0100
- To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: > As for content negotiation, I think it would be nice > if http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/ was configured to return > the tagged ontology file as RDF/XML for requests made with accept headers > specifying "application/rdf+xml". This would be very clean and would not > result in the ontology specifying a HG dependent URL. I am not disagreeing this would be preferable - however we already got this on http://www.w3.org/ns/prov > Our WD tagged ontology would have: > > <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">PROV Ontology</rdfs:label> > <owl:versionIRI > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/"/> > </owl:Ontology> However I think the owl:versionIRI should give you (some format of) OWL file no matter how your request it. So if I copy from my text editor the version IRI and open it in the browser, I should get the OWL. Therefore I would suggest: <owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/prov.owl" /> (Ie the same as the 'here' link on http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/ ) You can also have an rdfs:seeAlso to http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-o-20120503/ to show the right version of the documentation. I think for the TR releases this is what owl:versionIRI should say, as that is what will be preserved 'forever'. The Mercurial site is not guaranteed to stay there by W3C. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 13:55:12 UTC