Re: Proposal on PROV-DM reorganization

On May 21, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Paolo Missier wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am basically in favour of the changes proposed, with a few minor points:
> 
> ...
> 
> - importantly what are these /patterns/??   these have always been constructs, relations, etc. Patterns to me are particular compositions of these that are designed to achieve a particular effect. I think these are not patterns. 
> 
+1

-Tim

> Regards,
>   -Paolo
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 20, 2012, at 6:01 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > During last week's telcon [1] the chairs were tasked to come-up with a
>> > proposal that tried to reflect consensus on reorganization of the data
>> > model. This would take into account both Graham's proposal [2] as well
>> > as the WG discusion and prior agreements.
>> >
>> > We've come up with with the following proposal:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvDM_ConsensusProposal
>> >
>> > We hope this reflects a consensus with the working group and something
>> > we could proceed on. Is this a good foundation to proceed?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Paul
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-05-17
>> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvDM_Proposal_for_restructuring
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----------  ~oo~  --------------
> Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org 
> School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
> http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier