Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm]

Hi Tim,

With the draft, I believe that your suggestion is directly supported 
by.  I am
proposing to close this issue pending your review.

Cheers,
Luc

[1] 
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd6-bundle.html

On 02/22/2012 06:17 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/260
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm
>
> Please add a note to section Note to encourage people to use Account / AccountEntity/ Provenance to annotate provenance assertions as a better practice. When using AccountEntity, the annotated thing can be described _directly_ as a single triple instead of using Notes. Notes are very much "scruffy  provenance" and do not benefit from the directness afforded by AccountEntity / prov:Provenance.
>
> :prov_1 {
>   :simon a prov:Human;
>          prov:hasAnnotation [
>               a prov:Note; ex3:reputation "excellent";
>               rdfs:comment "This is a kludge way to get indirection. Use prov:Provenance instead.";
>          ];
> }
>
> :prov_2 {
>    :simon ex3:reputation "excellent" .
> }
>
> :prov_1 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :first_asserter .
> :prov_2 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :trust_evaluator_agent.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 13:47:20 UTC