Re: Mini-mini comment on prov-dm

On May 7, 2012, at 16:00 , Paul Groth wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
> 
> It's an interesting comment about modeling the process. It's important
> to remember we don't represent eventualities in provenance only what
> has happened. So we would only model that W3C management agrees and a
> publication occurs.
> 

That would be fine. I must admit I got a little bit lost when I tried to do that on where it is correct to put dates, for example...

Ivan

> We mention this somewhere but it's probably not clear enough…
> 
> Paul
> 
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> I see that the Prov-DM uses the W3C publication process as an example. Some of the terms referred to in the document actually exist, better use those:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf
>> 
>> I know it is a bit sketchy, and should be updated, but it is a start. There is at least a class for WD, PR, etc.
>> 
>> Challenge: model the whole W3C publication process with Prov-O... looking at this what I tried to describe (and I did not really succeed) is to interpret things like: a some publications occur only when the W3C management agrees, on a transition call, that the document is fine for publication (which is the case for, eg, Candidate Recommendations...)
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 14:54:29 UTC