- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 10:34:02 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|a9119e3085897c86f9e854ebaef6cc45o4SBY808L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|9BF64D51>
Sent to the list for the record. Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom Begin forwarded message: From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> Date: 29 May 2012 11:27:21 GMT+01:00 To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-383 (how-to-handle-subtypes): How to handle subtypes in PROV-DM [prov-dm] I realized after I sent this that I was thinking in RDF mode... in PROV-N subtyping is declared using attributes, so this last comment of mine is somewhat moot. It also turns out that I misread your original email, and on re-reading my comments don't make any sense in this context. Best ignore them. Sorry for the distraction. #g -- On 29/05/2012 11:00, Luc Moreau wrote: Hi Graham, I don't understand this, can you explain the implication of your suggestions for both prov-dm an prov-n? On 05/29/2012 10:14 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: y tentative intuition, then, is this: (1) use direct subtyping for subsets of Entity, Activity and Agent. (2) use type annotations for suptypes of the various relations.
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 10:34:33 UTC