- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:12:07 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On May 18, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-378 (clarifyHadActivity): clarify hadActivity [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/378 > > Raised by: Daniel Garijo > On product: Ontology > > We should clarify the difference between prov:activity and prov:hadActivity (so people don't use prov:hadActivity in qualifiedGenerations). > > We could add a restirction on Generation: > Generation subclassOf [ on prov:hadActivity max 0 ] . > ^^ This is within RL and states the restriction that would prevent the confusion between activity and hadActivity. > And, since the difference between activity and hadActivity is that the former is not optional: > Generation subclassOf [ on prov:activity min 1 ] . ^^ min 1 goes against RL, which is why we've been avoiding them. > > Also, we should add an rdf:comment explaining this decision. ^^ Do you have a proposed comment to put in? THanks, TIm > > > > >
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 12:12:37 UTC