- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:51:56 -0400
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
One part to consider is where the anchor "lands" - it does not show the narrative that appears above the constraint. Ideally, the anchor would be moved to above the narrative, so one could read it without scrolling up. But I did notice that divs were added to delineate the narrative+constraint. That was the main aspect of this issue (which is addressed). -TIm On May 21, 2012, at 11:02 AM, James Cheney wrote: > Hi, > > I believe this issue has been addressed. Tim, do you agree with closing it? > > --James > > On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/345 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm-constraints >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/releases/ED-prov-dm-20120402/prov-dm-constraints.html#usage-precedes-invalidation >> >> does not clearly delineate where the discussion for one constraint starts and where the next ends. This makes it unreasonably difficult to read. >> >> BLOCKER for release as public draft. >> >> This can be fixed with styling to visually separate the pile of constraints. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > >
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 17:52:54 UTC