- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:11:38 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all, This issue is now close. Regards, Luc On 05/08/2012 03:05 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi all, > > I propose to close this issue pending review, following changes to the > derivation signatures [1]. > > Luc > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012May/0095.html > > On 04/30/2012 11:41 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility >> in derivation [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/368 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: prov-dm >> >> >> We are having ongoing discussion about responsibility in derivations >> (see ISSUE-357 and ISSUE-352). >> >> In the spirit of simplification, I would like to suggest that agents >> should not be mentioned in derivation relations. >> >> Instead of >> wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,ag,attrs) >> we should write >> wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,attrs) >> and wasAttributedTo(e2,ag) >> >> >> Instead of >> wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,ag2,ag1,attrs) >> we should write: >> wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,attrs) >> and wasAttributedTo(e1,ag1) >> and wasAttributedTo(e2,ag2) >> >> >> >> We are not losing in expressivity, I believe, instead, we decouple >> components 2 and 3 in the data model. >> >> Furthermore, if we allow optional arguments in derivations, >> wasDerivedFrom(id, e2, e1, a, g2, u1, attrs) >> they should also be allowed in quotation/original source/revision, to >> make these proper subrelations. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:12:13 UTC