- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:37:02 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Paul. The prov-o team discussed your suggestion today and I'll try to implement something soon. Regards, Tim On May 19, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi TIm, > > This looks cool. I was wondering if really what you want is "class can > be used with relationship" cross reference? Or would this be too much? > > thanks > Paul > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> wg, >> >> More cross referencing was added to link "less direct" relationships between >> classes and properties. >> >> >> >> For example, >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/3acc7d101d59/ontology/Overview.html#Usage >> >> now shows: >> >> a domain of prov:hadRole parent is in domain of prov:atTime prov:entity >> >> >> >> This should help the use of, in particular, the Involvement subclasses. >> >> Some questions: >> >> 1) Are these new cross references useful? >> >> 2) Are there other cross references that you would find useful? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail >> [PROV-O HTML] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/350 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: PROV-O HTML >> >> Anything with a union domain needs to be fixed in the cross reference >> script. >> >> e.g. >> http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#hadActivity >> has >> >> has domain >> >> prov:Involvement >> TODO: one of a few classes. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam > >
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 18:38:02 UTC