Sunday, 30 June 1996
- Re: new web analysis page available
- Re: new web analysis page available
- Re: new web analysis page available
Saturday, 29 June 1996
Friday, 28 June 1996
Thursday, 27 June 1996
- Re: charset flap
- Re: charset flap
- Re: charset flap
- Re: charset flap
- TRACE as traceroute
- charset flap
- Re: DRAFT Minutes, HTTP working group
- DRAFT Minutes, HTTP working group
Wednesday, 26 June 1996
Tuesday, 25 June 1996
Monday, 24 June 1996
Sunday, 23 June 1996
Thursday, 20 June 1996
- Re: REVISED AGENDA for http-wg
- Re: REVISED AGENDA for http-wg
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- REVISED AGENDA for http-wg
Wednesday, 19 June 1996
Tuesday, 18 June 1996
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- can you PUT and POST cookies too?
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: "1:n domain cookies" issue status
Monday, 17 June 1996
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- [Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no: nonexistent-WG Last Call on MIME documents]
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- Re: Montreal Informal BOF on HTTP-based management.
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: "1:n domain cookies" issue status
- Montreal Informal BOF on HTTP-based management.
Sunday, 16 June 1996
- "1:n domain cookies" issue status
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
Saturday, 15 June 1996
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
Friday, 14 June 1996
Saturday, 15 June 1996
Friday, 14 June 1996
- Re: Mozilla and If-Modified-Since
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: Mozilla and If-Modified-Since
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-05.txt, .ps
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: P-HTTP and Slow-Start [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
Thursday, 13 June 1996
Friday, 14 June 1996
- RE: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: Mozilla and If-Modified-Since
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Re: Mozilla and If-Modified-Since
- Re: Mozilla and If-Modified-Since
- Mozilla and If-Modified-Since
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- I-D ACTION:draft-holtman-http-negotiation-01.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-02.txt, .ps
- Re: Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: P-HTTP and Slow-Start [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
Thursday, 13 June 1996
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- Content negotiation draft 01 available
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
- Re: Privacy concerns with entity tags
- Re: Privacy concerns with entity tags
- Privacy concerns with entity tags
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-mda-00.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-mda-00.txt
Wednesday, 12 June 1996
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-digest-aa-04.txt
- RFC 1945 formats
- [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest]
Tuesday, 11 June 1996
- Sun White Paper on WebNFS
- RE: Final Review of Digest Authentication
- RE: Final Review of Digest Authentication
- Re: Please publish draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-05 as an Internet Standard
- Re: Final Review of Digest Authentication
- Re: Minor edits to draft 04
- RE: Final Review of Digest Authentication
- Re: Minor edits to draft 04
- Re: Final Review of Digest Authentication
Monday, 10 June 1996
- Re: draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- RE: Final Review of Digest Authentication
- Final Review of Digest Authentication
- draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt LAST CALL
- HTTP/1.1 process
- Please publish draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-05 as an Internet Standard
- Re: Minor edits to draft 04
- RE: Require WWW clients to describe password/security
- RE: Require WWW clients to describe password/security
- How upload file from form-page?
- RE: Require WWW clients to describe password/security
- Internet draft 05 issued....
Sunday, 9 June 1996
Saturday, 8 June 1996
Friday, 7 June 1996
- Re: change 14.21 Expires
- Re: 14.9.4 proxy-revalidate
- Minor edits to draft 04
- change 14.21 Expires
- 14.9.4 proxy-revalidate
- change 13.7.1
- Re: CHANGES to 14.9 Cache-Control
- Re: CHANGES to 14.9 Cache-Control
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: CHANGES to 14.9 Cache-Control
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: EDITs to 13.4.2, 14.9.5, and 14.45 (related to no-transform)
- Re: EDITs to 10.3.5 (304 Not Modified)
- Re: questions and comments about the Warning header
- Re: CHANGE to 19.2 multipart/byteranges
- Re: EDITs to 10.3.5 (304 Not Modified)
- Re: EDITs to 10.3.5 (304 Not Modified)
- Re: EDITs to 10.3.5 (304 Not Modified)
- Re: Age header (14.6)
- Re: names of authors
- Re: revised suggested registered names for character sets
- names of authors
- Re: EDITs to 13.4.2, 14.9.5, and 14.45 (related to no-transform)
- HTTP-WG Montreal moved (Tuesday & Wednesday); agenda
Thursday, 6 June 1996
- CHANGES to 14.9 Cache-Control
- "semantically transparent" (was Re: More small edits to draft 04a)
- Change to Vary header requirements
- Re: is Accept header BNF ambiguous ?
- Re: questions and comments about the Warning header
- Draft cutoff date...
- Re: questions and comments about the Warning header
- CHANGE to 19.2 multipart/byteranges
- Section 13.2.3
- EDITs to 10.3.5 (304 Not Modified)
- CHANGE to 9.2 OPTIONS
- questions and comments about the Warning header
- EDITs to 14.9.2 (no-store)
- EDITs to 13.4.2, 14.9.5, and 14.45 (related to no-transform)
- Re: no-transform
- Re: Concerns with draft-04...
- Re: Minimum HTTP version (was: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die)
- Re: Concerns with draft-04...
- Re: no-transform
- Re: Minimum HTTP version (was: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die)
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- is Accept header BNF ambiguous ?
- Re: no-transform
- Re: Minimum HTTP version (was: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die)
- Re: no-transform
- Re: revised suggested registered names for character sets
- Re: no-transform
- Re: revised suggested registered names for character sets
- Concerns with draft-04...
- Re: no-transform
- Re: revised suggested registered names for character sets
- Re: Minimum HTTP version (was: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die)
- 13.1.1 Cache Correctness
- Minimum HTTP version (was: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die)
- Re: no-transform
- Re: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- no-transform
- Re: Accept-Ranges: the controversy that wouldn't die
Wednesday, 5 June 1996
- revised suggested registered names for character sets
- Re: Content-Encoding: who does what?
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Content-Encoding: who does what?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-04.txt, .ps
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: Meaning of Last-Modified/I-M-S (was Re: Last gasp terminology issue)
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Last Call on SHTTP and SHTML
Sunday, 5 May 1996
Tuesday, 4 June 1996
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: Meaning of Last-Modified/I-M-S (was Re: Last gasp terminology issue)
- Re: Meaning of Last-Modified/I-M-S (was Re: Last gasp terminology issue)
- Meaning of Last-Modified/I-M-S (was Re: Last gasp terminology issue)
- Re: Accept-Ranges (was Re: More small edits to draft 04a)
- Re: mxb (was: Re: 14.36)
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: NIT (squared): v11-spec-04.txt: 14.36 Range
- Re: NIT (squared): v11-spec-04.txt: 14.36 Range
- Re: NIT (squared): v11-spec-04.txt: 14.36 Range
- NIT: v11-spec-04.txt: 14.36 Range
- mxb (was: Re: 14.36)
- Re: revision of "content coding" and "advise to RFC Editor"
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: revision of "content coding" and "advise to RFC Editor"
- Re: Last gasp terminology issue
- Text vesion of ID04 available
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: More small edits to draft 04a
- Re: Internet draft 04 available.
- Re: Internet draft 04 available.
Monday, 3 June 1996
- Accept-Ranges (was Re: More small edits to draft 04a)
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: More small edits to draft 04a
- Re: Sections 13.2.4 and 13.3.3
- Last gasp terminology issue
- Re: 10.4 Client Error 4xx and 10.5 Server Error
- Re: Rev81: byte range inconsistencies
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Re: Rev81: byte range inconsistencies
- Internet draft 04 available.
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- Rev81: byte range inconsistencies
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: Sections 13.2.4 and 13.3.3
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Sections 13.2.4 and 13.3.3
- Section 13.2.3
- RE: repeat of a comment from a long time ago
- Section 13.1.5
- Section 13
- RE: repeat of a comment from a long time ago
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: More small edits to draft 04a
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: process for closing out HTTP/1.1
- repeat of a comment from a long time ago
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- RE: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- process for closing out HTTP/1.1
- Major errors in Caching and Cache-Control
- More small edits to draft 04a
- Production of Draft 04 begins...
- Re: More small edits to draft 04a
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- More small edits to draft 04a
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: Details...
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- quickie global replace
- Re: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- (no subject)
- Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- (no subject)
- Various comments on pre-04
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: PUT and ETag (or Last-Modified-Date)...
- Re: 10.4 Client Error 4xx and 10.5 Server Error
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- 10.4 Client Error 4xx and 10.5 Server Error
Sunday, 2 June 1996
- Re: Section 9.4 POST
- Re: revision of "content coding" and "advise to RFC Editor"
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: PUT and ETag (or Last-Modified-Date)...
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43)
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
Saturday, 1 June 1996
- Re: Unidentified subject!
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- PUT and ETag (or Last-Modified-Date)...
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: Section 3.2.2
- Various comments on pre-04
- Re: Details...
- 12, 14.43: resource arguments and conneg
- Re: Details...
- chunked BNF
- Re: Wordsmithing changes, 8.1.2.2, 12.1, 13.1.2, 14.6,14.13
- Re: Rev81: CHANGE: Sect. 11.1 Basic Authentication
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Section 3.2.2
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: Unidentified subject!
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- FYI: Montreal meeting schedule possibly changing..
- Re: Section 9.4 POST
- revision of "content coding" and "advise to RFC Editor"
- Re: Rev81: CHANGE: Sect. 11.1 Basic Authentication
- Re: Section 4.2 :determining length
- Re: Rev81: CHANGE: Sect. 11.1 Basic Authentication
- Re: Section 3.2.2
- RE: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- RE: Section 9.4 POST
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Unidentified subject!
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: Section 9.4 POST
- Re: Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...
- Re: Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...
Friday, 31 May 1996
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Section 9.4 POST
- Re: Repeat of proposed addition to Age calculations (pre-04 13.2.3)
- Re: Proposed change to 14.6 (Age)
- Re: Unsubscribe
- Re: Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Unidentified subject!
- Re: 14.36
- Section 14.36 Range, and PUTs
- Re: 14.36
- RE: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Section 3.2.2
- Re: 14.36
- RE: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Rev81: CHANGE: Sect. 11.1 Basic Authentication
- Re: 14.36
- Re: Rev81: CHANGE: Sect. 11.1 Basic Authentication
- Secton 3.12.1
- Re: Wordsmithing changes, 8.1.2.2, 12.1, 13.1.2, 14.6,14.13
- Re: Proposed change to 14.6 (Age)
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Entity vs Entity-body
- Re: Section 8.2
- RE: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Section 6.1.1
- Re: Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Section 6.1.1
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: Section 8.2
- Re: Section 8.2
- Re: Section 6.1.1
- Re: Section 8.2
- Section 8.2
- Section 8.2
- Section 6.1.1
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Sections 3.3.1 and 5.1
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Entity vs Entity-body
- Re: Repeat of proposed addition to Age calculations (pre-04 13.2.3)
- 14.36
- Wordsmithing changes, 8.1.2.2, 12.1, 13.1.2, 14.6,14.13
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Re: Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Rev81: COMMENT: 5.2 The Resource Identified by a Request
- Details...
- Rev81: CHANGE: Sect. 11.1 Basic Authentication
- Re: WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
- Re: Transparency relaxed by cache
- 13.1.4 Explicit UA Warnings
- Re: Transmission Delay
- Repeat of proposed addition to Age calculations (pre-04 13.2.3)
- 13.1.4 Explicit UA Warnings
- Transparency relaxed by cache
- Re: Transmission Delay
- Re: WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
- Re: Transmission Delay
Thursday, 30 May 1996
- Automatic retry
- Proposed change to 14.6 (Age)
- Proposed change to 10.4.7 (406 Not Acceptable)
- Text version of draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-04a available
- Re: draft agenda for Montreal
- stop
- v11-04 COMMENT: *repeat* Re: PERSIST: Made default
- Plain text of almost 04 document...
- Re: Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...
- Re: Variant (was Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...)
- Re: Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...
- Re: Variant (was Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...)
- Rules for combining headers in a caching proxy...
- Section 5.3 (Request Header Fields) omits If-Unmodified-Since
Wednesday, 29 May 1996
- cacheability of response codes.
- Transmission Delay
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: Almost draft 04 of HTTP/1.1
- Re: Non editorial comments...
- Re: Almost draft 04 of HTTP/1.1
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: WORKING GROUP LAST CALL
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- draft agenda for Montreal
Tuesday, 28 May 1996
Wednesday, 29 May 1996
Tuesday, 28 May 1996
- RE: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- RE: v11-03 COMMENT: 14 Access Authentication
Wednesday, 29 May 1996
Tuesday, 28 May 1996
- Vary
- RE: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: persistant connections and proxies
- RE: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- FW: v11-03 COMMENT: 14 Access Authentication
- Re: persistant connections and proxies
- Re: persistant connections and proxies
- Non editorial comments...
- Re: persistant connections and proxies
- Re: persistant connections and proxies
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- v11-03 COMMENT: 14 Access Authentication
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
- Re: Changes to Content Negotiation, Entity Tags, and If-*
Monday, 27 May 1996
- Re: content negotiation flap (resend)
- Re: content negotiation flap (resend)
- Re: content negotiation flap (resend)
- Re: content negotiation flap (resend)
- Re: 7.6 Transfer Codings idea...?
- Re: 7.6 Transfer Codings idea...?
- content negotiation flap (resend)
Sunday, 26 May 1996
Saturday, 25 May 1996
Friday, 24 May 1996
- Re: PERSIST: Made default
- Re: PERSIST: Made default
- Re: PERSIST: Made default
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: (following) 19.1 Authentication of Clients
- Re: PERSIST: Made default
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: (following) 19.1 Authentication of Clients
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: (following) 19.1 Authentication of Clients
- PERSIST: Made default
- Re: Shortening the draft.
Thursday, 23 May 1996
- Re: Shortening the draft.
- Re: Shortening the draft.
- Re: Shortening the draft.
- Shortening the draft.
- status report from an editing group...
Wednesday, 22 May 1996
Tuesday, 21 May 1996
Monday, 20 May 1996
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.2.4 Age Calculations
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparancy
- docs on w3 out of sync?
- minor comments on 03 spec
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 3.5 Terminology, Resource entity
Sunday, 19 May 1996
- some comments on HTTP/1.1 spec (03)
- v11-03 COMMENT: Generic resources, various edits
- v11-03 COMMENT: 3.5 Terminology, Resource entity
Saturday, 18 May 1996
Friday, 17 May 1996
- v11-03 COMMENT: 16.2.4 Age Calculations
- v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1.4 Explicit User Agent Warnings
- v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparancy
- v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1.1 Cache correctness
- v11-03 COMMENT: 15.1 Negotiation Facilities Defined in this Specification
- Some comments on the HTTP/1.1 draft
- Re: HTTP 1.1 As Universal Transport?
- Re: Other model of how caching of generic resources works
Thursday, 16 May 1996
- Other model of how caching of generic resources works
- Re: HTTP/1.1 comments
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- HTTP Server Stats
- Re: HTTP 1.1 As Universal Transport?
- Re: HTTP 1.1 As Universal Transport?
- Re: HTTP 1.1 As Universal Transport?
- HTTP 1.1 As Universal Transport?
- process sermon
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- Re: HTTP/1.1 comments
Wednesday, 15 May 1996
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.8 Errors or Incomplete ...
- Re: HTTP/1.1 comments
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.8 Errors or Incomplete ...
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 12.4 Client Error 4xx
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparency
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- Re: the case for multiple entities per URL
- Re: the case for multiple entities per URL
- the case for multiple entities per URL
- Re: Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
Tuesday, 14 May 1996
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 18.48 Warning
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 18.29 If-Unmodified-Since
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.8 Errors or Incomplete ...
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 12.4 Client Error 4xx
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparency
- Record of http discussions at the Paris WWW conference
- Re: Apache problem (fwd)
- HTTP-WG schedule for Montreal IETF
- Error in document?
Monday, 13 May 1996
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 18.1 Accept
- Re: v11-03 COMMENT: 18.1 Accept
- Re: (POST) new multi-phase and security
- Re: (POST) new multi-phase and security
- v11-03 COMMENT: (following) 19.1 Authentication of Clients
- v11-03 COMMENT: 18.48 Warning
- v11-03 COMMENT: 18.29 If-Unmodified-Since
- v11-03 COMMENT: 18.28 If-Range
- v11-03 COMMENT: 18.2 Accept-Charset (and 18.4)
- v11-03 COMMENT: 18.10 Cache-Control
- v11-03 COMMENT: 18.1 Accept
- v11-03 COMMENT: 16.8 Errors or Incomplete ...
- v11-03 COMMENT: 16.1 Semantic Transparency
- v11-03 COMMENT: 12.4 Client Error 4xx
- v11-03 COMMENT: no entity body
- v11-03 COMMENT: 9. Request
- Working group "nearly last call" on draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt
Friday, 10 May 1996
Thursday, 9 May 1996
- Re: OFF-TOPIC - experiment TERMINATED!
- Re: HEAD (was Re: Link Verification)
- Re: HEAD (was Re: Link Verification)
- Re: (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair
- Re: HEAD (was Re: Link Verification)
- (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair
- Re: (POST) new multi-phase and security
Wednesday, 8 May 1996
- HEAD (was Re: Link Verification)
- Re: Persistent and Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.1
- Re: Persistent and Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.1
- Re: Link Verification
Tuesday, 7 May 1996
- Re: Link Verification
- Link Verification
- Re: Proposal for two new authentication schemes...
- Re: Proposal for two new authentication schemes...
- Re: Proposal for two new authentication schemes...
- Re: Proposal for two new authentication schemes...
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt
- Proposal for two new authentication schemes...
Friday, 3 May 1996
- Re: How To Set Up a Chat Server
- How To Set Up a Chat Server
- Administrivia: Unattended list
- Re: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt
- RE: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.ps
- 18.10 Cache-Control
- draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.txt
- draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-03.ps
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
Thursday, 2 May 1996
- RE: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- RE: Authentication With Multiple Challenges
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)
- Re: EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)
- RE: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)
- Re: EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)
- Re: Persistent and Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.1
- EDIT: Section 11.1 userid-password
- Re: Persistent and Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.1
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: Variant-IDs and Entity Tags (was Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.)
- Re: Need EDIT 3.2.1 - "+" not safe
- Need EDIT 3.2.1 - "+" not safe
- Persistent and Keep-Alive in HTTP/1.1
Wednesday, 1 May 1996
- RE: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: SPOOF issue (Was: Re: Rewrite of 13.12 (Cache keys))
- Re: EDITS for Section 10.16 (Content-Location)
- Variant-IDs and Entity Tags (was Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.)
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- RE: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)
Tuesday, 30 April 1996
- RE: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: 10.12 Content-Length
- RE: EDITS for Section 10.16 (Content-Location) (2)
- RE: EDITS for Section 10.16 (Content-Location)
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- Re: EDITS for Section 10.16 (Content-Location)
- Re: SPOOF issue (Was: Re: Rewrite of 13.12 (Cache keys))
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: 10.22 Host
- Re: 10.22 Host
- Re: 10.22 Host
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Terminology -- another try
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
Monday, 29 April 1996
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- 11. Access Authentication
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology (suggestions)
- Re: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- 10.22 Host
- Re: HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- 10.12 Content-Length
- EDIT for section 13.3.4
- HTTP 1.1 document terminology.
- RE: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- EDIT for sec 14.1
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-mgmt-01.txt, .ps
- Re: EDITS for Section 10.16 (Content-Location)
Sunday, 28 April 1996
- EDITS for Section 13.20 (Cache Replacement for Varying Resources)
- EDITS for Section 10.16 (Content-Location)
- EDITS for Section 5 (Request) (Was: Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI)
- Re: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
Saturday, 27 April 1996
- Re: Rewrite of 13.12 (Cache keys)
- SPOOF issue (Was: Re: Rewrite of 13.12 (Cache keys))
- Re: Rewrite of 13.12 (Cache keys)
- RE: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- Re: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- Re: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
Friday, 26 April 1996
- Re: 8.12 TRACE and entity
- RE: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- Re: [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- Re: [CACHING] corrected_initial_age computation question
- [Content-MD5 and Message Digest Authentication.], MD5 broken.
- 8.12 TRACE and entity
- [CACHING] corrected_initial_age computation question
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Various problems in the 02 draft
Thursday, 25 April 1996
- Re: 3.17.2 Byte Ranges
- Re: 3.17.2 Byte Ranges
- Re: 3.17.2 Byte Ranges
- Re: Two-phase sends
- Re: 3.17.2 Byte Ranges
- 3.17.2 Byte Ranges
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- 201 Created
- RE: Two-phase sends
- RE: Two-phase sends
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- Re: Two-phase sends
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- Re: Two-phase sends
- Re: 5.1.2 Request-URI
- Re: 3.2.1 General Syntax: net_path
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Typo in draft 2
- Re: Two-phase sends
- Re: Two-phase sends
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
Wednesday, 24 April 1996
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: 3.2.1 General Syntax: net_path
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: Host request-header MUST accompany...
- Re: Host request-header MUST accompany...
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- RE: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- RE: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Host request-header MUST accompany...
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- OPTIONS/absoluteURI/*, Sect. 5.1.2
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- 5.1.2 Request-URI
- 3.2.1 General Syntax: net_path
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-02.txt, .ps
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Two-phase sends
- Re: Proxy authentication
Tuesday, 23 April 1996
- Re: NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: Proxy authentication
- NULL-Request (Sect. 4.1)
- Re: YA cookie draft, v2.21
- Re: YA cookie draft, v2.21
- Re: YA cookie draft, v2.21
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Re: YA cookie draft, v2.21
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Authorization header
- YA cookie draft, v2.21
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Re: Submission of HTTP/1.1 Draft 02
- Re: cookie draft available
- Submission of HTTP/1.1 Draft 02
Monday, 22 April 1996
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
Sunday, 21 April 1996
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Re: Proxy authentication
Saturday, 20 April 1996
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Re: Proxy authentication
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: Proxy authentication
Friday, 19 April 1996
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Proxy authentication
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Digest Authentication in HTTP/1.1
- Schedule for next HTTP 1.1 drafts.
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Re: HTTP extensibility: musings and a proposal
- Re: PERSIST: propose to make default
- Re: HTTP extensibility: musings and a proposal
- Re: cookie draft available
Thursday, 18 April 1996
Friday, 19 April 1996
Thursday, 18 April 1996
- PERSIST: propose to make default
- A not quite internet draft of the HTTP 1.1 is available.
- A not quite internet draft of the HTTP 1.1 is available.
- Re: HTTP extensibility: musings and a proposal
- HTTP extensibility: musings and a proposal
Wednesday, 17 April 1996
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: cookie draft available
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- cookie draft available
- Re: http URL defn in HTTP/1.0
Tuesday, 16 April 1996
- DNS lookup code...
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
Monday, 15 April 1996
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- Re: PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- PERSIST: headers needed at all?
- Re: http URL defn in HTTP/1.0
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Consensus
- Re: http URL defn in HTTP/1.0
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Consensus
- RE: (ACCEPT*) Consensus
- http URL defn in HTTP/1.0
- Re: (USERTRACKING) Draft text
Sunday, 14 April 1996
Saturday, 13 April 1996
Friday, 12 April 1996
- RE: Persistent Connections
- Digest Access Authentication Draft
- Persistent Connections
- Re: Several Content-Encodings
Wednesday, 10 April 1996
Thursday, 11 April 1996
- (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY) Updated draft text for Vary header and content negotiation `hooks'
- INTEGOK; CONTENT-MD5 -- consensus
- ISO-8859-10; registration of new charset values; error in MIME draft
Wednesday, 10 April 1996
Tuesday, 9 April 1996
- (VARY) Removal of `Vary: {unknown}'
- Re: Issue: CHARSET, character sets and charset
- Re: Issue: CHARSET, character sets and charset
- Re: Issue: CHARSET, character sets and charset
- Re: Issue: CHARSET, character sets and charset
- Re: Issue: CHARSET, character sets and charset
- A scary data point
- Issue: CHARSET, character sets and charset
Monday, 8 April 1996
- (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY) Newer draft text for Vary header and content negotiation `hooks'
- INTEGOK; CONTENT-MD5
- Re: INTEGOK (aka CONTENT-MD5)
- Re: INTEGOK (aka CONTENT-MD5)
- INTEGOK (aka CONTENT-MD5)
- (DNS) consensus wording resolution.
Saturday, 6 April 1996
Friday, 5 April 1996
- Re: (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY) New draft text for Vary header and content negotiation `hooks'
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Last call on draft text for Accept headers
- (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY) New draft text for Vary header and content negotiation `hooks'
- UCI Archives will be down this weekend
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Last call on draft text for Accept headers
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Last call on draft text for Accept headers
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Last call on draft text for Accept headers
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
Thursday, 4 April 1996
- (ACCEPT*) Last call on draft text for Accept headers
- (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY,ACCEPT*) Consensus on strategy
- Consensus version of security considerations for basic authentication
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
Wednesday, 3 April 1996
- CHUNKED: closed
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- REWRITE: updated consensus wording
- RE: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- RE: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: (DNS) consensus wording
- 505 HTTP Version Not Supported
- Re: INTEGOK: updated wording
- TRACE and Max-Forwards
- Re: (INTEGOK) rough consensus
Tuesday, 2 April 1996
- Re: (INTEGOK) rough consensus
- Re: Document Action: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0 toInformational
- Re: (DNS) consensus wording
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
- Distributed interactive sims on the Web
- Re: suggested wording concerning Host
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
- Re: suggested wording concerning Host
- INTEGOK: updated wording
- Re: suggested wording concerning Host
- Re: Via Header Field (replaces Forwarded)
- suggested wording concerning Host
- Re: Via Header Field (replaces Forwarded)
- Re: UPGRADE: Wording
- Re: (INTEGOK) rough consensus
- RE: (INTEGOK) rough consensus
- Re: (INTEGOK) rough consensus
- (CONTENT) consensus
- (PRIVACY) Consensus
Monday, 1 April 1996
- (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY) Draft text for Vary header and content negotiation `hooks'
- Re: (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
- Re: Document Action: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0 toInformational
- (CODES) Consensus
- (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
- (CONTENT NEGOTIATION,VARY,ACCEPT*) Strategic decisions
- (HOST) (FULLURL) consensus wording. (try, try again)
- Re: (HOST) (FULLURL) draft of changes for W.G. review.
- (HOST) (FULLURL) consensus wording.
- Document Action: Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0 to Informational
- RE: URLLEN: consensus
- (DNS) consensus wording
- Re: (DNS) consensus wording
- UPGRADE: Wording
- Re: URLLEN: consensus
- Re: (DNS) consensus wording
- Re: (DNS) consensus wording
- ENDHEAD: duplicates CHUNKED
- CONTENT-MD5: duplicate
- REWRITE: consensus
- URLLEN: consensus
- CHUNKED: draft changes
- (INTEGOK) rough consensus